- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:32:28 -0500
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021031112902.01c6ee88@mailserver.nist.gov>
The following is a list of the SpecGL @@@ questions/comments. I've indicated those that we addressed at the last telcon, and those that are still open. Updated SpecGL problems/issues ** indicates priority. * indicates we can deal with this quickly The following were addressed during telcon, 28 Oct. G 1: explanation and clean-up of sentence on use cases (editorial) Drafting assignment: Andrew/Lynne due prior to 4 Nov 1.3: make the statement stronger. Currently requires only 1 example Agree, this should be made stronger 3.1 TOC for profiles drafting assignment: Lynne may not be done prior to 6 Nov publication try to develop 1 checkpoint 3.5 what is meant by 'testable rule' 'clash' testable rule = testable requirement. Replace clash with contradict 6.2 and 6.3 rationale for CP on strict conformance Drafting assignment: David, lofton/lynne to review. Revisit explanation and clarify, review all checkpoints. **12.1, 12.2 normative ICS discussed at prior telcon The following still need to be addressed *2.2: move discussion on class of product to ET *2.2 reword CP or its TA 3.3 do we need a rationale or write a better one 7.2 reword CP or its TA - suggested CP reword: Define support requirements for deprecated features" 7.3 applicability of CP to class of product G9 rewritten, general consensus 9.6 applicability, remove? 13.1 add words on capitalization 13.3 testability of consistent terminology **14.1 TA discussion on normativity
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 11:38:54 UTC