- From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:38:09 -0700
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
My vote: option #1 or option #3 We spent a lot of time on the f2f discussing the timing issue, did careful analysis and everybody voted for the 11am - 12pm with additional reserved 0.5h. As for the fact that Mark and Lynne and may be some other folks cannot make it after 12 - should we ever require an additional time for QAWG-all work, we can reorder agenda, so that issues important for the folks are discussed within the first 1h. This 0.5h after 12pm is the special extra time - not the regular. Should I be in minority, I also suggest option #3. I honestly doubt I'll be able to be in clear working mind at 7:30am Monday morning on the regular basis:) Option #3 ----- every Monday slot: 10:30-12 agenda goal: 11:00-12:00* 10:30-11: normally for editors, etc 10:30-11: occasional all-QAWG time if needed** > >*Note: "normal" agenda plan is 1 hr. > >**Comment: Since the proposed agenda always goes out at least 2nd day > >before telcon, it would indicate if an extra-ordinary 1-1/2 hour all-QAWG > >session is needed or planned. However, this would likely be > >discussed/known much further in advance, e.g., previous telecon. Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:20 PM > To: www-qa-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: settle new telecon > > > My choice: Option #2. > > Reasons: > > It is what I thought I was voting for at Tokyo, except in the 12-12:30 > time > slot. I.e., at Tokyo I didn't understand that NIST people could *never* > (as Mark and Lynne said this morning) participate between 12-12:30. > > With Option 1 we could never do an all-QAWG telecon of 1-1/2 hours. > Unless > the chairs coordinate all members and schedule another bridge slot -- > conceivably impossible (and unfair to chairs!). > > Based on experience before 8/26 publication, and 5/15 publication, this > does not seem like a wise choice, and does not seem fair to Lead Editors > (but maybe other Lead Editors disagree). Btw, it's not just us who go > crazy before publication: SVG sometimes goes from 2-1/2 hours telecon > time > per week to 3-1/2 or 4, and just inserted (with 4 weeks notice) an extra > face-to-face! > > Note in both options, the plan is for a "normal" agenda of 1 hour. The > extra half hour could normally be used for doc-tech pow-wow, TTF (Test > Task > Force), TestGL editors discussion, [nothing,] etc. The extra half hour > would be available for all-QAWG business, with advance planning and > announcement, for contingent high-priority needs (e.g., pending > publications). > > -Lofton. > > At 04:18 PM 10/16/02 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: > > >QAWG participants -- > > > >Everyone, please reply -- Option 1 or Option 2 -- for new telecon > >schedule. (Optional: state your reasons.) > > > >Option 1 > >----- > >every Monday > >slot: 11-12:30 > >agenda goal: 11-12* > >12-12:30: for editors, etc** > > > >*Note: "normal" agenda plan is 1 hr. > >**Comment: because NIST people can *never* attend 12-12:30, we can't > ever > >have all-QAWG time then, even if editors need it in final crush (1 or 2 > >meetings) before a publication milestone. > > > >Option 2 > >----- > >every Monday > >slot: 10:30-12 > >agenda goal: 10:30-11:30* > >11:30-12: normally for editors, etc > >11:30-12: occasional all-QAWG time if needed** > > > >*Note: "normal" agenda plan is 1 hr. > >**Comment: Since the proposed agenda always goes out at least 2nd day > >before telcon, it would indicate if an extra-ordinary 1-1/2 hour all-QAWG > >session is needed or planned. However, this would likely be > >discussed/known much further in advance, e.g., previous telecon. > > > >(My vote -- see next message.) > > > >Regards, > >-Lofton. > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 18:38:42 UTC