- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:24:12 -0600
- To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 02:25 PM 10/16/02 -0400, Mark Skall wrote: >I think we need to make decisions and stick to them. We decided to have >one hour telcons, but reserve an hour and a half. [...] We had that >discussion at the F2F and came to a decision (at least I thought we did). Mark, the whole reason that we are arguing about this is that our memories and/or understandings of that decision differ. Perhaps it is only me, perhaps others also didn't appreciate a key aspect, as related today. As I said, I wouldn't have voted "yes". Be that as it may, see next mail from me, to resolve the dispute. A couple other comments... >[...] I, for one, do not find the telcons to be all that productive You mean, aside from Eudora ;-) Seriously though, I would like to give you a call (phone) for some constructive discussion off-line -- too tedious by email -- of how to improve meeting efficiency. We did some of this at Tokyo, but there are still some un-addressed bits. >increasing their time frequency to 3 hours every 2 weeks That is not what I envision. See next message. >[...] Let's not schedule time for things we MAY need. It's not a matter of scheduling the time pre-emptively. It is a matter of not being trapped on those occasions where we really need it. Part 2 will follow shortly. -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 17:22:24 UTC