- From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:48:12 -0700
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <qa-chairs@w3.org>, "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Message-ID: <B3F0DACD72892E4DB7E8296C6C9FC2F605AD80E8@red-msg-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Hi all, Here is what I intend to send tomorrow 2pm (PDT) as our review of the SOAP 1.2 Attachment feature. Let me know if you want to change/add anything. I understand that this is a short notice. So if you think the notice is too short, please say so. Then I will send it anyway but with the disclaimer: "has not been endorsed or reviewed by QA WG". Note that this must go to the public xmlp-comment list. Thanks ====================================================== To: xmlp-comments@w3.org Cc: David Fallside Hi all, Here is the feedback from QA WG on the SOAP 1.2 Attachment: Overall the document [1] describes a compound SOAP structure, an abstract feature that would require a choice of the specific transport/encapsulation protocol bindings in order to be implemented. Therefore an implementation of this specifications is a specification in it's turn - a binding specification. In our review we attempted to measure the testability of the binding specifications that implement [1] implied by [1]. We find that the following could be added/changed in [1] in order to improve testability of the binding specifications that implement [1]: 1. Conformance clause should be added that would - describe the subject of conformance (a binding specification) - summarizes what does it mean to conform to this specification - List dependencies: describe what other parts of SOAP 1.2 specification/other specifications a binding must conform to in order to conform to this specification 2. Prefix att is not defined. QNames of the form att:* are used, but prefix att is not associated with any namespace. Would be good to explicitly associate it in the prose with the URI http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap/features/attachment" 3. Sec 2 - Change "can" to "may" in the "Protocol binding specifications can use this URI" to conform to RFC 2119. Unless there is a good reason, we suggest to even change it to "should", so that there is not ambiguity on whether the specific binding uses the soap1.2 attachment feature. 4. Section 6: We suggest to explicitly reference the equivalence rules used for the URIs when the message parts are identified. (We believe editors meant the URI equivalence rules specified in the URI spec [3]). The fact that XML namespace spec uses different equivalence rules for namespace URIs then the original URI spec causes a confusion among developers on which rules to use in each case of the URIs use. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-af/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/ [3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt Thanks >Resent-Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:35:54 -0400 (EDT) >To: <chairs@w3.org> >From: "David C. Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com> >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:24:26 -0700 >X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM005/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.10 >|March 22, 2002) at > 10/07/2002 01:35:20 PM >Subject: Reminder: XMLP WG "Attachment Feature" LC deadline in 8 days >Resent-From: chairs@w3.org >X-Mailing-List: <chairs@w3.org> archive/latest/2167 >X-Loop: chairs@w3.org >Sender: chairs-request@w3.org >Resent-Sender: chairs-request@w3.org >List-Id: <chairs.w3.org> >List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:chairs-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com> > > >This is a reminder that the Last Call review period for XMLP WG's 8 page >SOAP Attachment Feature WD ends in 8 days. > >............................................ >David C. Fallside, IBM >Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 >Int Ph: 544.9665 >fallside@us.ibm.com > > > >Forwarding... >Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:11 AM >To: chairs@w3.org >cc: >From: David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS >Subject: XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2 Attachment >Feature > > > > >==== >I. This is the last call announcement from the XML Protocol Working Group >(XMLP WG) for review of the "SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature" specification. > >==== >II. Request for Document Review. > >The XMLP WG asks for reviews of the following document: > >-- SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature [1] >Abstract. "This document defines a SOAP feature that represents an abstract >model for SOAP attachments. It provides the basis for the creation of SOAP >bindings that transmit such attachments along with a SOAP envelope, and >provides for reference of those attachments from the envelope. SOAP >attachments are described using the notion of a compound document structure >consisting of a primary SOAP message part and zero or more related >documents parts known as attachments." > >All comments on this document should be sent to xmlp-comments@w3.org. If >appropriate, please include section-references in your comments. The >appropriate forum for discussion of any of this document is the public W3C >xml-dist-app mailing list [2]. > >==== >III. XMLP WG Intentions. > >-- The Attachment Feature is on a separate Recommendation track from the >main SOAP 1.2 specification. However, after Last Call for the Attachment >Feature, the XMLP WG intends to conduct subsequent reviews of the >Attachment Feature in conjunction with the SOAP 1.2 specification. > >==== >IV. The Last Call review period ends at 5p Pacific Time, 15 October 2002. > >==== >V. The following W3C Working Groups are especially invited to provide >review comments: > >-- I18N >-- QA >-- Semantic Web Activity (WG's therein) >-- Web Services Architecture >-- Web Services Description >-- XForms >-- XML Core >-- XML Encryption >-- XML Signature > >==== >VI. Patent Disclosures. > >A listing and summary of the IPR statements by XMLP WG members is available >[3]. > >==== >VII. The XMLP WG's decision to request Last Call is minuted at [4] > >==== >VIII. References. > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-af/ >[2] xml-dist-app@w3.org >[3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/17-IPR-statements.html >[4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/09/18-minutes.html > >.............................................................. >David C. Fallside >Chair, XML Protocol Working Group >Tel: 530.477.7169 >fallside@us.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 02:48:46 UTC