- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:08:08 -0600
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Karl, et al -- The referenced http://www.w3.org/Guide/LastCall relates to topics we were discussing this morning, and topics which we will discuss next Tuesday morning in Tokyo. See especially #2 in the numbered list near the beginning. "...which W3C Working Groups and other parties should review the last call draft". It would seem to me that this includes almost all WGs, right? If the GL documents are to be mandatory, then don't they significantly affect all WGs? In other words, in the 3 months after Tokyo, before Last Call, this seems to say that we need to get a commitment to review from *every* WG? -Lofton. At 01:01 PM 10/1/02 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: >Dear Members of the QA WG, > >something to read :) >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2002OctDec/0001.html (Member >only) :( > > > >-- >Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager > http://www.w3.org/QA/ > > --- Be Strict To Be Cool! --- >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 19:06:42 UTC