- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:21:48 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
That is what I thought and also hope is true. lynne At 11:14 AM 11/27/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote: >Good minutes, thanks. I need one clarification ... > >At 10:25 AM 11/26/02 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >>[...] >>--------------- >> >>3) Draft QA Process Document >>LR has integrated most of the last week discussions resolutions into the >>QA WG Process Document draft, which consist mostly of an outline of what >>the document shoud be: >>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/11/ProcessDoc-20021121.html >>PF agrees to become the maintainer of the document once it's finalized >>and unless anyone else wants to take on it. > >I thought that Peter was going to take Lynne's outline (as she called it) >and turn it into a proper document -- full sentences, etc. I.e., Lynne is >done with it at this point, and Peter will be the document editor for a >while. Did I misunderstand? > >-Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2002 11:29:14 UTC