- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 07:20:09 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 07:26:42 UTC
Here is our proposed replacement text
12.1 Provide an Implementation Conformance Statement proforma
To fulfill this checkpoint, a specification MUST either
- include or reference an ICS
- explain why an ICS is not needed
The inclusion of an ICS may not be applicable to all specifications. An
ICS that is part of a specification does not preclude other organizations
such as certification organizations, from having their own ICS. A
specification's ICS can be thought of as providing a minimal list of items
supported by the implementation, capturing information the WG deems
necessary to support conformance claims.
12.2 Require the ICS be completed as part of the conformance claim
To fulfill this checkpoint, the specification MUST include the ICS as part
of its conformance claim requirements.
This checkpoint is not applicable, if an ICS is not included in the
specification.
Rationale: The ICS is coupled with the requirements for making a
conformance claim (guideline 11), thus providing specific information about
the implementation and substantiating the conformance claim.
-lynne and mark.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 07:26:42 UTC