- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 07:20:09 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 07:26:42 UTC
Here is our proposed replacement text 12.1 Provide an Implementation Conformance Statement proforma To fulfill this checkpoint, a specification MUST either - include or reference an ICS - explain why an ICS is not needed The inclusion of an ICS may not be applicable to all specifications. An ICS that is part of a specification does not preclude other organizations such as certification organizations, from having their own ICS. A specification's ICS can be thought of as providing a minimal list of items supported by the implementation, capturing information the WG deems necessary to support conformance claims. 12.2 Require the ICS be completed as part of the conformance claim To fulfill this checkpoint, the specification MUST include the ICS as part of its conformance claim requirements. This checkpoint is not applicable, if an ICS is not included in the specification. Rationale: The ICS is coupled with the requirements for making a conformance claim (guideline 11), thus providing specific information about the implementation and substantiating the conformance claim. -lynne and mark.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 07:26:42 UTC