Re: Glossaries (Was Re: Action Items review)

QA Working Group --

Will anyone volunteer to take over this Action Item, to start and maintain 
the QA Glossary?

-Lofton.

At 12:56 PM 1/18/02 +0900, Olivier Thereaux wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
> >
> > For this one
> >    A-2001-11-12-3  Karl, Daniel  QA glossary and taxonomy
> >       Pending
> >
> > I'd like to reassign Karl/Olivier to it, since I know Olivier has been
> > doing some work in the area.
>
>Well...
>
>I am working on the W3C glosary but it's very different from the QA
>glossary: W3C glossary now consists in developing a technical basis
>for working groups (and translators) to input their definitions and
>translations of W3C related terms.
>
>QA glossary is more urgent, I think, and is, basically, the QA part of
>the input decribed above. I don't consider myself fluent enough in "QA
>english" yet to be able to produce such a document.
>
>Besides, I have many other projects, some with tight deadlines (namely,
>mail search engine needs to be ready for tech plen), and I don't think I
>can make time for this additional one.
>
>Therefore, I'm really sorry, I can't take this over, at least for some
>time.
>
>--
>Olivier

Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 16:18:33 UTC