Fwd: TAG issues during technical plenary

QA WG,

Are there any issues that QA wants to raise with TAG?

-Lofton.

>Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:27:53 -0500 (EST)
>From: "David Orchard" <david.orchard@bea.com>
>To: <chairs@w3.org>
>Cc: <tag@w3.org>
>Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:24:05 -0800
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>Importance: Normal
>Subject: TAG issues during technical plenary
>Resent-From: chairs@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <chairs@w3.org> archive/latest/1749
>X-Loop: chairs@w3.org
>Sender: chairs-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: chairs-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <chairs.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:chairs-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>
>Dear chairs,
>
>The TAG requests your assistance in two matters.  Firstly, the TAG solicits
>your input on topics that the TAG should address.  The TAG has the charter
>to publish recommendations on issues.  We believe in surveying a wide
>spectrum of parties for issues to address, and your help would be
>appreciated.  Secondly, some members of the TAG also believe that the TAG
>should provide artifacts/documents that provide context for Recommendations.
>One example of the context is an architecture document with various text and
>diagrams.  The TAG solicits your input on what forms of context would be
>useful to you.
>
>The technical plenary agenda [1] has a portion of time for the TAG.  We
>would like to present information on our documentation deliverables and
>issues list during the session, so your feedback sufficiently before then
>would be much appreciated.
>
>Cheers,
>Dave Orchard
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/Plenary/Agenda.html

Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 12:38:44 UTC