W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Issue #22

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 20:57:36 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: david_marston@us.ibm.com
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Thanks for your comments.  I want to be sure that I capture it in some way, 
and it doesn't slip away (maybe it should lead to phrasing a new issue, but 
I'd like to clarify first.)

I think this relates to the 2nd bullet in Issue 22 [1].

Issues 12/25 (redundant) address the horizontal WGs relationship.  Issue 37 
bears on external entities, but a different aspect.  There is some 
discussion in Procs&Ops of transferring external work to W3C.

But I don't see that the issue has yet been raised in general, about 
relationships with external groups.

At 02:05 PM 1/4/2002 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote:

>I'd be happy to see the Framework Introduction go out as-is for FPWD,
>but I certainly expect some debate about mentioning external groups.

Could you elaborate a bit please?  Is there some specific aspect which we 
in QA should be debating, in your view?  Should the definition of the 
relationship be taking place in a larger context than QA?  The Procs&Ops 
document deals with several aspects of WG/external entity 
relationships.  Is it missing something which should be there?

>In particular, I think OASIS and W3C have a relationship, whether or
>not it's formally agreed upon, that affects the QA Activity and these


[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html#x22, Issues 
document--issue #22:

Lofton Henderson
1919 Fourteenth St., #604
Boulder, CO   80302

Phone:  303-449-8728
Email:  lofton@rockynet.com
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2002 22:59:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:29 UTC