- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 11:51:46 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Hi Karl, Thanks for doing minutes. Comments in-line... At 03:41 PM 1/3/02 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote: >QA Working Group Teleconference >Thursday, 3-January-2002 >-- >Scribe: >(DB) Karl Dubost (W3C, WG co-chair) > >Attendees: >(DD) Daniel Dardailler (W3C - IG co-chair) >(dd) Dimitris Dimitriadis (Ontologicon) >(DB) Karl Dubost (W3C, WG co-chair) >(DH) Dominique Hazael-Massieux (W3C - Webmaster) >(LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO - WG co-chair) >(SA) Selim Aissi (Intel) >(OT) Olivier Thereaux (W3C - systems) >(LR) Lynne Rosenthal (NIST - IG co-chair) >(KG) Kirill Gavrylyuk (Microsoft) >(MS) Mark Skall (NIST) Add: (DM) David Marston (Lotus Development Corporation) >Regrets: > >Absent: >(PF) Peter Fawcett (RealNetworks) >(KH) Katie Haritos-Shea (NIST) >(OC) Oriol Carbo (U. of Edinburgh) >(AT) Andrew Thackrah (Open Group) > >*** Summary of New Action Items: *** > >(from 2002-01-03 telcon) >A-2002-01-03-1 DB: modify the Matrix for the MathML Validator. >A-2002-01-03-2 KG: Write a Draft for Conformance clause and circulate it >as a text on the www-qa-wg >A-2002-01-03-3 DD: Write an email about the model of the documents. Is this about the below minuted "DD: Ask to Ian for details on the process." (Note versus WD versus ...)? As I recall, DD also took an action item to write a critique and suggested fixes to align Procs&Ops usage of Guideline/Checkpoint with the WAI model. (In any case, DD has two AIs here.) >[...] > >DD: At minimum a unified document for checkpoints and guidelines. > >LH: I'll ask to Ian to have comments on it. Change "I'll ask" to "I have asked". (I already did it a few days ago). >DD: If we want to use a particular model, we should use the model of other >specs. > >LH: Guidelines and Checkpoints seem to be more an editorial issue. > >KG: We can try. > >LH: Write a mail to the list how the mail is broken. I think "mail" should be "model"? (p.s. This, I think, is where DD accepted the action item to write the critique.) Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 13:51:54 UTC