- From: Andrew Thackrah <andrew@opengroup.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:35:16 +0000
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
> Agenda > ===== > 3.) OpsGL leftovers > - CP6.1 proposal okay? (default: yes) [2a] > - CP4.6 proposal okay? (default: yes) [2b] > - issue 59 [2c] Before the telcon, here are a few comments on [2c] (test material licensing) Checkpoint says >> WG MUST define ... at least one license that is agreeable to the WG. This implies that the WG has restrictions/requirements on licenses. Are these published anywhere? We should try to help the readers of OpsGL by linking to this so they can avoid all the usual pitfalls. E.g. It seems that materials must be freely available, but how about freely usable? Availability can be quantified. Source or binary only, platform dependent etc? I think these details are out of our scope but if someone has already worked this out we should reference a definitive guide rather than just link to examples. -ADT > [2c] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Dec/0078.html
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 10:37:02 UTC