- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 04 Dec 2002 00:42:56 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1038958978.17524.428.camel@stratustier>
Le mar 03/12/2002 à 22:12, Karl Dubost a écrit : > Possible solutions: > > 1. In the QA Matrix [1], integrate every document, even WD, and give > an additional information when these ones have a status (Deprecated, > abandoned, integrated, etc) > > 2. When a WD will never reach another status, than the ones cited > previously, the document MUST be updated a last time to show its > current status. 1 seems an overkill and would hurt the Matrix usability quite badly. 2 is suggested by the Process Document anyway: "However, publication of a technical report at one maturity level does not guarantee that it will advance to the next. Some technical reports may be dropped as active work or may be subsumed by other technical reports. If, at any maturity level of the Recommendation track, work on a technical report ceases (e.g., because a Working Group or Activity closes, or because the work is subsumed by another technical report), the technical report should be published as a W3C Note and the status section should include the rationale." http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr.html#Recs If only it was indeed applied... > [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix [The Matrix evolution probably belongs to www-qa, BTW] Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/INRIA mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:42:59 UTC