RE: ATTN reviewers! (Reminder & New Skeletons)

> This is a reminder that review assignment results are NOT to be sent to public lists.

A WG might require that the summary would be sent to the public comments list in order to take any effect. 

 

This is the ambiguity we ran into with XML Protocol review - the process to submit issues for the last call is through the public list.

 

So I think we should amend our rule with 

"....If otherwise necessary, MUST put an appropriate disclaimer that the review results were not discussed by QA WG and represent solely your opinion"

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:24 PM
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Cc: dominique Hazaël-Massieux
Subject: ATTN reviewers! (Reminder & New Skeletons)

 

ATTENTION QAWG reviewers,

This is a reminder that review assignment results are NOT to be sent to public lists.  They need to be sent to Dom, who will put them in /QA/Group/ space and link them from the reviews matrix [1] (also in Group space).

Please fetch the new skeletons -- they now contain this reminder, as well as a better-structured title/header:




Ops:  http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/qaframe-ops-0716-skeleton
Spec: http://www.w3.org/QA//WG/2002/08/qaframe-spec-0811-skeleton <http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/08/qaframe-spec-0811-skeleton> 


These are also linked from the reviews matrix [1], which links will always contain the most current skeletons.

-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Aug/0109.html (2nd pgph under "2. Logistical topics")