- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:52:59 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 12:50:34 UTC
For today's telcon on Spec Guidelines [1], we listed the general agenda as: >[...] > >-- is anything missing (i.e., any more checkpoints needed?) >-- should any of the checkpoints be removed? >-- wording and description of Guidelines/Checkpoints? >-- priorities of checkpoints? > >We will handle specific issues from WG members first, then we will >commence a comprehensive pass (similar to Issue#55 for Ops Guidelines). Here are a couple of existing specific open topics related to Spec Guidelines .1) Two spec-related issues [2]: #51 [Spec]: Deprecated features #15 [Spec]: valid conformance claims. 2.) David's contribution to "Spec Modularity" thread [3] Regards, Lofton [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/framework-20020405/qaframe-spec [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Apr/0029.html
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 12:50:34 UTC