- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:34:00 -0500
- To: <w3c-ccpp-wg@w3.org>, "Johan Hjelm" <johan.hjelm@era-t.ericsson.se>
- Cc: <www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org>
Last August I responded to the comments of the CC/PP working group on P3P http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-p3p-specification/2000Aug/0110.html Having not heard back from your group, I assume you found our response satisfactory, or at least not sufficiently objectionable to continue the discussion at this time. Now that we have submitted our working draft for CR http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/Drafts/WD-P3P-20001123a we have been asked to demonstrate that no other W3C working groups have outstanding concerns about P3P that should be addressed before going to CR. I would appreciate it if you could send a message to www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org confirming that the CC/PP working group has no outstanding concerns about P3P that should be addressed before P3P enters CR. Thanks, Lorrie Cranor P3P Specification Working Group Chair
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 09:36:07 UTC