- From: <struan.robertson@out-law.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:17:10 +0100
- To: "Brian Erdelyi" <brian@clearware.org>
- Cc: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AABC28914D981949BB0E85AB60ADF63E015A1320@gla-ex01.PinsentMasons.local>
Personally I think a lot of websites have tired of labels because there are so many around and so few that influence visitors. P3P is something we've never implemented on OUT-LAW but it's still in my mind to do so - I've just never made the time for it. While I like your idea, I expect you'll have a struggle winning support. Clearly your idea and P3P are not just labels - but that may be how they're perceived by some. Struan ___________________________________ Struan Robertson Senior Associate, Pinsent Masons Editor, OUT-LAW.COM & AboutCookies.org DDI: +44 (0)141 249 5422 Fax: +44 (0)141 248 6655 Mob. +44 (0)7771 88 10 22 www.out-law.com <http://www.out-law.com/> www.pinsentmasons.com <http://www.out-law.com/> www.aboutcookies.org <http://www.out-law.com/> Pinsent Masons named IP/IT Team of the Year: http://www.out-law.com/page-7071 -----Original Message----- From: brian.erdelyi@gmail.com [mailto:brian.erdelyi@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Erdelyi Sent: 07 September 2006 12:58 To: struan.robertson@out-law.com Cc: www-p3p-policy@w3.org Subject: Re: Proposal to help fight deceptive software I think it can work voluntarily, however, thats why I posted to the P3P list. How easy is it to get websites to volunatarily publish P3P policies? Many vendors spend alot of money to get TRUSTe certified. This is essentially an assurance for marketing purposes. A Clearware label could be freely used to help improve consumer awareness and show their commitment to the end-user while differentiating themselves from competitors. I have been discussing with some vendors who are interested in using the idea, but it's slow to get moving. Getting vendor participation is the bigest issue so far. Brian I like that idea, Brian. I'm guessing you've already thought of this, but can it work without labelling being mandatory? Presumably the purveyors of deceptive software are the least likely people to comply. I'd be interested to know your thoughts. Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg== rwY5out7yq7kaxwLjKA12UvEh6WbbVn4uRs9bl6r9YlKB4eWGtGv0hdNZUDF+mC1!wjcErRD jo56lngFIb!xgoON!3q3QlN5LRcNDC5EBCMi+XUUpcQAFtCk7jEcFSYpbwYej9BXwYsivh5c urWz4KAfvEJQEsp5AH4JHnsn2Bj+VkanXRv6uSnZ> to report this email as spam._SPAMREPORTEND
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2006 15:19:00 UTC