- From: JIM VAGLIA <jimjv@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:58:10 -0500
- To: "Rafiy M. Saleh" <saleh@cs.dal.ca>
- Cc: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
What would be the point of that, when they were the one's who wrote the document on the inaccessibility of caption? I am trying to make my voice heard before the main body before the final deadline. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rafiy M. Saleh" <saleh@cs.dal.ca> To: "JIM VAGLIA" <jimjv@verizon.net> Cc: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 2:44 PM Subject: Re: W3C visual caption inaccessible documentation: > Jim > > > I guess this is a wrong place for issues your are trying to bring in. In > fact you might be wasting your time. You might choose to be wise a bit > and concentrate on http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ and put your issues > on the table at wai-xtech@w3.org. > We are more interested with very "tiny" thing, just P3P. Unless you can > connect your arguments with P3P, I'll consider you as unproffessional who > is trying to use the so called "freedom of expression" irresponsibly. > > Raf > > JIM VAGLIA wrote: > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ > >
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 19:58:28 UTC