Re: W3C visual caption inaccessible documentation:

So why then are public comments welcome? Because I am blind, I am considered 
to be a moron and not part of the public, is that what you are suggesting?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
To: "JIM VAGLIA" <jimjv@verizon.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: W3C visual caption inaccessible documentation:


> This is not the mailing list for the W3C main body. This is a mailing 
> list for discussing the W3C platform for privacy preferences only. We 
> discuss privacy issues, nothing else. Unless your concerns relate to  this 
> privacy standard, then your discussion is completely irrelevant  to this 
> mailing list.
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:58 PM, JIM VAGLIA wrote:
>
>>
>> What would be the point of that, when they were the one's who wrote  the 
>> document on the inaccessibility of caption? I am trying to make  my voice 
>> heard before the main body before the final deadline.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rafiy M. Saleh" <saleh@cs.dal.ca>
>> To: "JIM VAGLIA" <jimjv@verizon.net>
>> Cc: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 2:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: W3C visual caption inaccessible documentation:
>>
>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess this is a wrong place for issues your are trying to bring  in. 
>>> In fact you might be wasting your time.  You might choose to  be wise a 
>>> bit and concentrate on http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/   and put your 
>>> issues on the table at  wai-xtech@w3.org.
>>> We are more interested with very "tiny" thing, just P3P. Unless  you can 
>>> connect your arguments with P3P, I'll consider you as  unproffessional 
>>> who is trying to use the so called "freedom of  expression" 
>>> irresponsibly.
>>>
>>> Raf
>>>
>>> JIM VAGLIA wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:18:30 UTC