- From: Eric Peterson <eric.peterson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:02:08 -0700
- To: www-p3p-policy@w3.org
Rigo, I got your email a few weeks back but have not had a chance to respond as of yet. I am wondering if you folks have any opinion/information about the situation where companies are entering into contractual arrangements with third-parties to manage subdomains on their behalf for the purpose of tracking using cookies. E.g., Apple pays Omniture to create a tracking domain called metrics.apple.com, having an IP address owned by Omniture, not apple. Do you have any insight into how P3P should be constructed in situations like this? Or, put another way, do you see inherent risk in companies doing this kind of thing? I ask because some of the tracking vendors then take aggregate data and repurpose that into widely viewable reports (e.g., Coremetrics LIVEmark, WebSideStory Statmarket, ...) My suspicion is that this is in conflict with site's stated P3P policy. Any insight you have is greatly appreciated. If you'd like to get on the phone that would be great. Thanks in advance, -- Eric T. Peterson Author, Web Analytics Demystified and Web Site Measurement Hacks Senior Analyst, JupiterResearch www.webanalyticsdemystified.com Have you joined the Metrics Discussion Group? Email webanalytics-subscribe@yahoogroups.com to join today!
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 02:08:53 UTC