- From: Martin Presler-Marshall <mpresler@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 07:59:58 -0500
- To: janice <janice@technofolk.com>, www-p3p-policy@w3.org
I think that's a very practical approach. Some organizations have very complex Web presences, and it is unrealistic to expect that you could have P3P policies created, approved, and deployed on all the sites or parts of the site at the same time. -- Martin Martin Presler-Marshall - Program Manager, Privacy Technology E-mail: mpresler@us.ibm.com AIM: jhreingold Phone: (919) 254-7819 (tie-line 444-7819) Fax: (919) 254-6430 (tie-line 444-6430) janice <janice@technofolk To: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> .com> cc: Sent by: Subject: Practicality of a phased P3P implementation www-p3p-policy-req uest@w3.org 01/22/2002 03:45 AM Dear folks, I have a question that I wouldlike to put out to the group. I have a real-world situation of a client with various site sections, which will be covered individually in their implementation of P3P. Would there be any shortcoming to the client implementing P3P on their site in a phased fashion (starting with their simplest parts first), and then adding sections one by one, and implementing P3P and updating the reference file as they go? They will have their policies for ALL sections described in their human readable policy, however, the sections which match the implemented P3P policies will be described in a more detailed P3P-compliant manner. Their policy and implementation will be updated step by step until the entire site is fully compliant. I hope this was clear LOL. Any input, suggestions or warnings would be much appreciated. Thank you. -janice
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 08:00:06 UTC