- From: Lui Lui Wong <luiluiw@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:47:45 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- CC: www-p3p-policy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3BD45BC1.23F3F6EF@netscape.com>
Hi Rigo, It is not sufficient to provide the full P3P policy for the cookies without supplying the Compact Policy when setting cookies in IE6.0. You need to provide a P3P compact policy header when u r setting cookies on IE6.0 in order to make your site P3P compliant on IE6.0. Thanks, Sara Rigo Wenning wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from "Reddy, Ramesh" <reddyr@agedwards.com> ----- > > From: "Reddy, Ramesh" <reddyr@agedwards.com> > To: "'www-p3p-policy@w3.org'" <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:50:10 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: [Moderator Action] IE 6.0 and P3P Policies Problems with Cookies > >From rigo Fri Oct 19 06:31:04 2001 > Envelope-to: rigo@localhost > Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 06:31:04 +0200 > Old-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 16:48:18 -0500 > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) > > Hi, > > Is it sufficient to provide the full P3P policy file for the cookies, > without supplying the Compact Policy? I have read in the specification that > Compact Policies are optional. However, it also mentioned that the Web > Servers are supposed to scan through the full p3p policy files and generate > the Compact Policies for the cookies. If our web server not yet compatible > with P3P policies(tomcat 3.2), doesn't this mean I have no option but > provide the compact policy in the http header even though I have the full > policy in place? > > Thanks in advance for any reply. > > Ramesh.. > > *************************************************************************************** > WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or > otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is > subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, > someone other than the recipient. > *************************************************************************************** > > ----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 13:48:30 UTC