- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:57:25 +0900
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: www-p3p-dev@w3.org
Le 06-03-31 à 12:17, Karl Dubost a écrit :
> [[[
> 2.2.1 Well-Known Location
>
> Web sites using P3P MAY (and, are strongly encouraged to) place a
> policy reference file in a "well-known" location. To do this, a
> policy reference file would be made available on the site at the
> path /w3c/p3p.xml
> ]]]
>
> -- The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.1 (P3P1.1) Specification
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-P3P11-20060210/#Well_Known_Location
> Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:51:33 GMT
After discussion with Rigo, I remove my formal objections but I still
maintain my issue about this chapter.
1. I would first remove (and, are strongly encouraged to).
We are trying to teach people and specifically companies that
it's not good to create a specific URI for a specific feature. Many
people have always excellent reasons to do so, but I really think
that we should not encourage this.
2. We should first give all the possible methods to achieve the
feature and as the last choice (if no other possible choices) to rely
on the WKL.
3. the P3P specification mentions it too. A Website is not a domain
name. It can be a subpart of a domain or even a collection of URIs on
different domains. I would encourage you to review and cross-check
your specification with
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20060307
See also the message of Mark Nottingham about it
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Mar/0049
Best Regards
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 3 April 2006 00:57:35 UTC