- From: Martin Presler-Marshall <mpresler@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:09:35 -0500
- To: www-p3p-dev@w3.org
URLs are case-sensitive, so any operations on them should use case-sensitive operations. It's true that some servers, including those running on Windows platforms, will map case-sensitive URLs to a case-insensitive filesystem, but the URLs themselves are fundamentally case-sensitive. -- Martin Martin Presler-Marshall - Program Manager, Privacy Technology E-mail: mpresler@us.ibm.com AIM: jhreingold Phone: (919) 254-7819 (tie-line 444-7819) Fax: (919) 254-6430 (tie-line 444-6430) "Giles Hogben" <giles.hogben@jr To: "p3pdev" <www-p3p-dev@w3.org> c.it> cc: Sent by: Subject: Case sensitivity of urls www-p3p-dev-requ est@w3.org 10/29/2001 06:24 AM We have come across a problem in our testing relating to the INCLUDE and EXCLUDE urls in policy reference files: The question is, should the urls contained in these be matched case insensitive or case sensitive. There seem to be problems associated with both alternatives: 1. If you require case sensitivity, then if the user accesses a Microsoft based server with the wrong case, the policy will not be found. For example if I try to access www.microsoftserver.com/testPage.html which is actually at www.microsoftserver.com/testpage.html And my policyreference file contains <INCLUDE>/testpage.html</INCLUDE> 2. If you do not require case sensitivity, then on a Unix based server, there could conceivably be different policies applying to files which differ only by case for example <INCLUDE>/testpage.html</INCLUDE> <EXCLUDE>/testPage.html</EXCLUDE> What is the policy on this? Thanks Giles Hogben
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 08:04:33 UTC