- From: Martin Presler-Marshall <mpresler@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:09:35 -0500
- To: www-p3p-dev@w3.org
URLs are case-sensitive, so any operations on them should use
case-sensitive operations. It's true that some servers, including those
running on Windows platforms, will map case-sensitive URLs to a
case-insensitive filesystem, but the URLs themselves are fundamentally
case-sensitive.
-- Martin
Martin Presler-Marshall - Program Manager, Privacy Technology
E-mail: mpresler@us.ibm.com AIM: jhreingold
Phone: (919) 254-7819 (tie-line 444-7819) Fax: (919) 254-6430 (tie-line
444-6430)
"Giles Hogben"
<giles.hogben@jr To: "p3pdev" <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>
c.it> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Case sensitivity of urls
www-p3p-dev-requ
est@w3.org
10/29/2001 06:24
AM
We have come across a problem in our testing relating to the INCLUDE and
EXCLUDE urls in policy reference files:
The question is, should the urls contained in these be matched case
insensitive or case sensitive.
There seem to be problems associated with both alternatives:
1. If you require case sensitivity, then if the user accesses a Microsoft
based server with the wrong case, the policy will not be found.
For example if I try to access www.microsoftserver.com/testPage.html
which is actually at www.microsoftserver.com/testpage.html
And my policyreference file contains <INCLUDE>/testpage.html</INCLUDE>
2. If you do not require case sensitivity, then on a Unix based server,
there could conceivably be different policies applying to files which
differ only by case for example
<INCLUDE>/testpage.html</INCLUDE>
<EXCLUDE>/testPage.html</EXCLUDE>
What is the policy on this?
Thanks
Giles Hogben
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 08:04:33 UTC