- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 01:27:52 +0900
- To: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
- Cc: "www-multimodal@w3.org" <www-multimodal@w3.org>, W3C Multimodal group <w3c-mmi-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9Vuy6-s1BoXhfpTx7MvKU48XHOAL+NYz97BQs_-z=e6Uw@mail.gmail.com>
> ... I'll add this image to the Overview.html > > ... and all the assigned use case editors should add this kind > > of diagrams to his/her use cases I've just added the SVG diagram to the Use Case document as well: - Use Case document: https://w3c.github.io/mmi/usecases/Overview.html - Diagram itself: https://github.com/w3c/mmi/blob/gh-pages/usecases/images/entities.svg Please note that I've added some background color for each use case description based on the discussion last week too. Thanks, Kazuyuki On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Deborah Dahl < dahl@conversational-technologies.com> wrote: > https://www.w3.org/2016/12/12-multimodal-minutes.html > > and below as text > > [1]W3C > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > > > - DRAFT - > > > > Multimodal Interaction Working Group Teleconference > > 12 Dec 2016 > > > > See also: [2]IRC log > > > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/12-multimodal-irc > > > > Attendees > > > > Present > > Debbie, Kaz > > > > Regrets > > helena > > > > Chair > > Debbie > > > > Scribe > > kaz > > > > Contents > > > > * [3]Topics > > 1. [4]actions > > 2. [5]charter > > 3. [6]Use cases > > * [7]Summary of Action Items > > * [8]Summary of Resolutions > > __________________________________________________________ > > > > <scribe> scribenick: kaz > > > > actions > > > > <ddahl> actions > > [9]https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/open > > > > [9] https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/open > > > > <ddahl> action 454? > > > > <ddahl> action-454? > > > > <trackbot> action-454 -- Deborah Dahl to Turn bullet list into > > text -- due 2016-09-05 -- OPEN > > > > ddahl: I'm behind... > > > > <trackbot> > > [10]https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/454 > > > > [10] https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/454 > > > > action-457? > > > > <trackbot> action-457 -- Kazuyuki Ashimura to Make a > > strawman/template diagram for relationships between entities in > > a use case -- due 2016-10-10 -- OPEN > > > > <trackbot> > > [11]https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/457 > > > > [11] https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/457 > > > > -> > > [12]https://github.com/w3c/mmi/blob/gh-pages/usecases/images/dr > > awing.svg basic template of entity relationship > > > > [12] https://github.com/w3c/mmi/blob/gh-pages/usecases/images/ > drawing.svg > > > > kaz: we can use this as the template for entity relationship > > > > dahl: wondering about the interaction between the visitor and > > the exhibit > > > > kaz: possibly touch the exhibit > > > > dahl: also ask questions and it starts talking > > > > <ddahl> labels for arcs might be "touch" or "information about > > exhibit"? > > > > kaz: good question > > ... could include both properties and actions > > > > ddahl: the visitor could be a student > > ... and can add labels for arcs > > > > <ddahl> should the use cases provide labels for the arcs? > > > > kaz: yes > > > > <ddahl> we aren't too interested in the interactions between > > people > > > > kaz: and Entity 2 could be an official at the reception desk > > > > (change the order later) > > > > scribe: so Entity 2 should be a guide terminal device or kiosk > > > > ddahl: ok > > ... and each use case should have this kind of diagram? > > > > kaz: yes > > ... I'll add this image to the Overview.html > > ... and all the assigned use case editors should add this kind > > of diagrams to his/her use cases > > > > action-458? > > > > <trackbot> action-458 -- B Helena RODRIGUEZ to Send wot person > > our vocabulary to get his comments and then we can reconcile > > our work with their work -- due 2016-10-24 -- OPEN > > > > <trackbot> > > [13]https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/458 > > > > [13] https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/458 > > > > kaz: Helena did add a subdirectory > > > > ddahl: would be better to have some description on the tool > > > > <ddahl> close action-462 > > > > <trackbot> Closed action-462. > > > > -> [14]https://github.com/w3c/mmi/tree/gh-pages/lib Helena's > > tools > > > > [14] https://github.com/w3c/mmi/tree/gh-pages/lib > > > > action-463? > > > > <trackbot> action-463 -- Kazuyuki Ashimura to Talk with > > johannes about a good time for an mmi/wot call, possibly during > > scripting time slot -- due 2016-11-28 -- OPEN > > > > <trackbot> > > [15]https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/463 > > > > [15] https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/463 > > > > kaz: we've just done that > > > > <ddahl> close action-463 > > > > <trackbot> Closed action-463. > > > > kaz: and the conclusion from the WoT Scripting call today was > > bringing this to the WoT IG main call > > ... possibly on Wednesday, Dec. 14 > > > > ddahl: can send a link to the list > > ... other than the MMI Architecture spec, what would be good to > > be sent? > > > > kaz: the MMI Interoperability Test Note > > > > ddahl: and your diagram? > > > > kaz: ok > > > > ddahl: and my demo > > > > kaz: and maybe Dirk also might want to send his demo and/or > > paper > > > > ddahl: good idea > > > > <ddahl> action-464? > > > > <trackbot> action-464 -- Kazuyuki Ashimura to Write more about > > uc-7 -- due 2016-11-28 -- OPEN > > > > <trackbot> > > [16]https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/464 > > > > [16] https://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/track/actions/464 > > > > kaz: not yet > > > > charter > > > > kaz: what should be the deliverables for the next period > > ... given the discussion with the WoT IG, maybe it would make > > sense to have a best practice doc or a guideline on bridging > > WoT and MMI > > ... and how should we handle EMMA 2.0 and MMI MC > > Discovery/Registration? > > > > ddahl: the biggest thing for EMMA 2.0 is that it's a JSON > > version > > ... we sort of promised we would do that > > ... and we need Helena for Discovery/Registration discussion > > ... have not reviewed Dirk's comment yet > > > > kaz: shall we skim that? > > > > ddahl: we can look at that > > > > -> > > [17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2016Nov > > /0003.html Dirk's comments > > > > [17] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2016Nov/ > 0003.html > > > > ddahl: the comments on abstract, status, etc., are editorial > > > > -> > > [18]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2016Nov > > /0005.html Dirk's comments on section 4 > > > > [18] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2016Nov/ > 0005.html > > > > kaz: the question on "MMI framework vs MMI Architecture" is > > interesting > > > > ddahl: we don't want to make the framework a standard > > ... all the comments look nice > > ... asking for good clarifications > > > > kaz: we should talk with Dirk and Helena about this in detail > > during the next call > > > > ddahl: ok > > > > Use cases > > > > -> [19]https://w3c.github.io/mmi/usecases/Overview.html Use > > Case doc > > > > [19] https://w3c.github.io/mmi/usecases/Overview.html > > > > kaz: should we add the relationship diagram to all the use > > cases before publishing? > > > > ddahl: don't think so > > ... maybe we could remove "museum" specific points from the > > template and make it completely diagram > > > > kaz: +1 > > ... and we should change the diagram template as well > > ... e.g., from concrete value to "property 1", etc. > > > > ddahl: yes > > ... and for the UC-7, the concrete entity might be a rice > > cooker and an air conditioner > > > > kaz: right > > > > ddahl: and maybe there is a home portal > > > > <ddahl> the user, vendor > > > > kaz: so Things and Stakeholders > > > > ddahl: child vs adult is important to distinguish who can deal > > with the device > > > > kaz: yes > > ... we might need some kind of authentication, e.g., based on > > age > > > > ddahl: yes > > ... if there is an instanciated version of the template, e.g., > > for the appliance use case, it would be useful for people > > > > kaz: +1 > > > > ddahl: which tool to use? would Inkscape be OK? > > ... SVG is great but if it's difficult for somebody to generate > > SVG, an image file would be also OK > > > > <ddahl> yEd is a good editing tool that can export SVG > > > > kaz: can try it if there is a Linux version > > > > (and there is a Linux version :) > > > > [ adjourned ] > > > > Summary of Action Items > > > > Summary of Resolutions > > > > [End of minutes] > > __________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [20]scribe.perl version > > 1.148 ([21]CVS log) > > $Date: 2016/12/12 15:03:38 $ > > > > [20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > > [21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > > -- Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, WoT, TV, MMI and Geo Tel: +81 3 3516 2504
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 17:30:01 UTC