Re: Possible typo in EmotionML working document

I accept your answer!  Thanks. :)

 -- J

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:58 AM,  <Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de> wrote:
> Hi again Josie
> Sorry to bother you, but I forgot to ask for your consent for our answer, which is required by W3C regulations.
> Could you please until, say, end of next week (17th Feb), state if you accept our answer, by replying to the list?
> Thanks for your understanding,
> Felix
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Burkhardt, Felix
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2012 10:24
> An: josienutter@gmail.com
> Cc: marc.schroeder@dfki.de; ashimura@w3.org; dahl@conversational-technologies.com; www-multimodal@w3.org
> Betreff: AW: Possible typo in EmotionML working document
>
> Hi Josie
> Thanks for reading our spec carefully!
> The typo will be corrected in the next version.
> Thanks,
> Felix Burkhardt
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@keio.w3.org] Im Auftrag von Kazuyuki Ashimura
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2012 22:13
> An: Deborah Dahl
> Cc: Burkhardt, Felix; Marc Schroeder
> Betreff: Re: Possible typo in EmotionML working document
>
> On 07/05/2012 04:57 AM, Deborah Dahl wrote:
>> I think that "agonistic" might actually be correct. I didn't know that
>> word, but according to Wikipedia, it refers to "social behavior
>> related to fighting".
>
> Hi Debbie,
>
> Right...
>
> I also have just Googled the following:
> - Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
> - agonistic
>
> and found that it seems Frijda's original definition includes "agonistic" instead of "agnostic"...
>
> Please see also page 89 at:
> http://books.google.co.jp/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rr8e5oMlj44C&oi=fnd&pg=PA78&dq=Frijda,+N.+H.+%281986%29.+The+Emotions.+Cambridge,+UK:+Cambridge+University+Press+agonistic&ots=wq1P8RLcWl&sig=bNkps9Q6zyQO4HLwF9BUhh_9XmI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=agonistic&f=false
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kazuyuki
>
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@keio.w3.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Kazuyuki Ashimura
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 2:41 PM
>>> To: Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de
>>> Cc: Marc Schroeder; Deborah Dahl
>>> Subject: Fwd: Possible typo in EmotionML working document
>>>
>>> Hi Felix,
>>> CCing Debbie and Marc (though not sure if Marc's DFKI address still
>>> works)
>>>
>>> Could you please respond to this comment?
>>>
>>> My understanding is "agnostic" here is not a typo.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Kazuyuki
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Possible typo in EmotionML working document
>>> Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:57:03 +0000
>>> Resent-From: www-multimodal@w3.org
>>> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:34:42 -0700
>>> From: Josie Nutter <josienutter@gmail.com>
>>> To: www-multimodal@w3.org
>>>
>>> In section 3.1.4 (
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-emotionml-20100729/#s3.1.4 ), I believe
>>> the term listed as "agnostic" was supposed to be "agonistic"?  Just
>>> clarifying - thanks!
>>>
>>> --
>>> J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice
> Tel: +81 466 49 1170
>
>
>



-- 
J

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 15:06:01 UTC