AW: Possible typo in EmotionML working document

Hi again Josie
Sorry to bother you, but I forgot to ask for your consent for our answer, which is required by W3C regulations.
Could you please until, say, end of next week (17th Feb), state if you accept our answer, by replying to the list?
Thanks for your understanding,
Felix

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Burkhardt, Felix 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2012 10:24
An: josienutter@gmail.com
Cc: marc.schroeder@dfki.de; ashimura@w3.org; dahl@conversational-technologies.com; www-multimodal@w3.org
Betreff: AW: Possible typo in EmotionML working document

Hi Josie
Thanks for reading our spec carefully!
The typo will be corrected in the next version.
Thanks,
Felix Burkhardt 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@keio.w3.org] Im Auftrag von Kazuyuki Ashimura
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2012 22:13
An: Deborah Dahl
Cc: Burkhardt, Felix; Marc Schroeder
Betreff: Re: Possible typo in EmotionML working document

On 07/05/2012 04:57 AM, Deborah Dahl wrote:
> I think that "agonistic" might actually be correct. I didn't know that 
> word, but according to Wikipedia, it refers to "social behavior 
> related to fighting".

Hi Debbie,

Right...

I also have just Googled the following:
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
- agonistic

and found that it seems Frijda's original definition includes "agonistic" instead of "agnostic"...

Please see also page 89 at:
http://books.google.co.jp/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rr8e5oMlj44C&oi=fnd&pg=PA78&dq=Frijda,+N.+H.+%281986%29.+The+Emotions.+Cambridge,+UK:+Cambridge+University+Press+agonistic&ots=wq1P8RLcWl&sig=bNkps9Q6zyQO4HLwF9BUhh_9XmI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=agonistic&f=false

Thanks,

Kazuyuki


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@keio.w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Kazuyuki Ashimura
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 2:41 PM
>> To: Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de
>> Cc: Marc Schroeder; Deborah Dahl
>> Subject: Fwd: Possible typo in EmotionML working document
>>
>> Hi Felix,
>> CCing Debbie and Marc (though not sure if Marc's DFKI address still
>> works)
>>
>> Could you please respond to this comment?
>>
>> My understanding is "agnostic" here is not a typo.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kazuyuki
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Possible typo in EmotionML working document
>> Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:57:03 +0000
>> Resent-From: www-multimodal@w3.org
>> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:34:42 -0700
>> From: Josie Nutter <josienutter@gmail.com>
>> To: www-multimodal@w3.org
>>
>> In section 3.1.4 (
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-emotionml-20100729/#s3.1.4 ), I believe 
>> the term listed as "agnostic" was supposed to be "agonistic"?  Just 
>> clarifying - thanks!
>>
>> --
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>
>


--
Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice
Tel: +81 466 49 1170

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 09:59:15 UTC