- From: <Shahriar.Karim@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:41:26 -0400
- To: <www-mobile@w3.org>
To respond to Scott's original request for comments : What about using good old T9 recognition with a customized "URL" dictionary ? This dictionary could be seeded with the usual suspects (http:, .com, .net, etc. as well as common sites such as CNN, Yahoo, etc.) and then could be added to by the user. >-----Original Message----- >From: www-mobile-request@w3.org >[mailto:www-mobile-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Gerhard Fasol >Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:31 PM >To: Scott Weiss; www-mobile@w3.org >Subject: Re: Accessing Mobile Sites > > >Scott: > >Some of what you write is correct, some is wrong. >I'll make some comments below. > >Scott Weiss wrote: >> >> Gerhard, thank you for sending the information on QR codes. It is an >> interesting solution to the problem of entering URLs on >mobile phones. >> It reminds me of the failed Cue Cat technology from the >early 2000's: >> http://cuecat.com/ Cue Cat attempted to solve the problem >identically, >> and it failed quickly and expensively for its founders. > >No, Cue Cat is not identical to QR codes at all. >QR codes are far more sophisticated than bar codes - no >comparison, not identical at all. > >For that reason the QR code company is a success. > >> QR codes are simply 2-D bar codes that require new handset hardware >> and software (and licensing fees to the patent holders) to allow >> scanning, > >no: your statement only partially correct - partly wrong. > >> analysis, and conversion to a URL. > >no. QR codes do much more than just conversion into an URL. > >> This technology is useful for >> tracking product inventories and scanning purchases, but is less >> appropriate for entering URLs. I do not think that this >technology is >> well-suited to mobile web site URLs, > >That's what you think. Can you give reasons? Have you ever tried it. > >The reality is that QR codes are very well-suited and in great use. > >> but strongly prefer the ability to >> enter a numeric code with a signifier such as star ('*') or >hash ('#'). > >That is your personal choice, but not the choice of the >Japanese market. > >> Furthermore, QR codes are primarily useful in close-proximity >> situations such as print advertising. They are less useful or not >> useful at all in outdoor advertising, broadcast, etc. A star or hash >> code could be read by an announcer, displayed on a television or >> outdoor ad, or sent to others by email or SMS. Star or hash >codes can >> also be made mnemonic as I mentioned in my initial posting. > >star and hash codes are not an alternative to QR codes. QR >codes are here to stay in Japan in addition to other ways of >input. If your hashcode method has merit it will coexist with >QR codes. If it does not have merit it will be replaced by >something else - plenty of alternatives to the hashcodes exist. > >> With a star or hash code, there is the possibility that the operator >> could implement back-end software to reply to the call with a >> connection via the browser, enabling existing handsets to access >> mobile sites without upgrading handsets. > >That needs a network connection. QR codes do not need a >network connection and are therefore much faster and much more >versatile > > >> Please comment on this possibility if you understand the back end of >> the operator's call processing. > >You don't need any for QR codes. > >For more details see: >http://www.eurotechnology.com/store/qr-code/ > >Hope this helps, > > >Gerhard > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Gerhard Fasol, PhD Eurotechnology Japan K. K. >http://fasol.com/ http://www.eurotechnology.com/ >g.fasol@ieee.org fasol@eurotechnology.com >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> At 06:58 PM 9/14/2005, Gerhard Fasol wrote: >> >>> In Japan QR-Codes are used for quick access to websites with mobile >>> phones. If you go to Japan, you'll find QR codes everywhere, see: >>> http://fasol.com/blog/2005/07/qr-codes-everywhere.html >>> ... >> >> >>> Scott Weiss wrote: >>> >>>> This thread is meant to be a discussion about accessing mobile web >>>> sites from phones. >>>> Entering URLs into mobile phones is problematic at best. >>>> ... >>> >>> >>> Scott Weiss >>> Principal, Usable Products Company: usableproducts.com >(212.929.8599) >>> Author, "Handheld Usability": handheldusability.com >> >> >> >> >> > > >-- >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Gerhard Fasol, PhD Eurotechnology Japan K. K. >http://fasol.com/ http://www.eurotechnology.com/ >g.fasol@ieee.org fasol@eurotechnology.com >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 17:42:56 UTC