Re: Potential f2f topics

Hi Mark,
I think the scope should be more tied to current W3C activities. For
instance, today we have "mobile profiles" from a lot of groups (CSS,
SVG, etc). These are actually not mobile, but minimal profiles. I think
it would be interesting to discuss how we could include mobile
technologies, such as positioning, into the W3C specification set.

I second the idea to discuss web services in a mobile perspective as
well. At least providing requirements will be important.

There is also the upcoming release 5 of the 3GPP specifications, which
contains several things that relate to W3C specifications, that I think
should be throroughly analyzed and understood.

But remind me again: When was the F2F? Is it for the cross-WG meeting in
february?

Johan


Mark Baker wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've received a couple of inquiries offline, asking about the
> potential topics Kaz and I were considering for the f2f.
> The ones we discussed included;
>
> - how to best take advantage of "always on" over the Web.
> Is the WAP 2.0 model of putting a micro web server on the
> device the best choice?  What are the issues in doing this
> for wireless?
> - in 2.5/3G networks, how "always on" is "always on", and what
> do we need from our protocols (if anything) to help us cope when
> "always on" only means "mostly on".
> - if, because of "always on", more information will be pushed
> our way, rather than pulled, how should personalization work?
> Is anything more needed of CC/PP, HTTP, or other parts of the
> stack to handle this case?
> - mobile web services; is anything special required?
>
> Kaz also had an interesting idea, but I'll leave it to him to
> decide what he wants to say about it at this time.
>
> There you have it.  Comments and suggestions for additional topics
> are always welcome.
>
> MB

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  Johan Hjelm, Senior Specialist
     Ericsson Research Japan

  Read more about my recent book
http://www.wireless-information.net
************************************