- From: Gerhard Fasol <fasol@eurotechnology.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 18:48:03 +0900
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
- CC: Dave Marutiak <dmarut@microsoft.com>, www-mobile@w3.org, fasol@eurotechnology.com
Yes, Martin - you are completely right. And there are more differences than this in the business models, marketing, technology implementation, company attitudes etc etc. You can find some of these differences explained in our imode-report: http://www1.mightywords.com/asp/bookinfo/bookinfo.asp?theisbn=EB00018336 and in our imode-FAQ: http://www.eurotechnology.com/imode/faq.html Best regards, Gerhard Fasol Eurotechnology Japan K. K. http://www.eurotechnology.com/ fasol@eurotechnology.com "Martin J. Duerst" wrote: > > At 00/09/19 23:35 +0900, Gerhard Fasol wrote: > >Dave, > > > >I understand what you are saying. But: > > > >(a) It's wrong that Japan is exclusively imode (CHMTL)! > > Japan is imode + WAP! > > But there is one more important difference between WAP > in Europe and in Japan. In Europe, WAP is used in marketing. > In Japan, even the end users using WAP never have heard > the word 'WAP'. This may be the greatest reason for > WAP mostly being talked about in an European context. > > Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 05:48:19 UTC