- From: <Quinton_Zondervan@lotus.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:30:02 -0500
- To: www-mobile@w3.org
I think you'd be pretty safe coding to WML in Europe.
Daniel Bertrand
<dcb@worldpath. To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
net> cc: www-mobile@w3.org, (bcc: Quinton Zondervan/CAM/Lotus)
Sent by: Subject: Re: WAP Competitors ?
www-mobile-requ
est@w3.org
03/06/00 12:15
PM
Please respond
to dcb
Okay, so HDML, WML, WBXML... This is getting confusing.
Up till now, most manufacturers had UPbrowser, it seems there will be
several to support now.
What should I serve to European clients to be on the safe side? Need to
start coding now!
Daniel Bertrand
http://www.say-parrot.com
Masayasu Ishikawa wrote:
>
> "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > At 12:24 00/03/06 +1100, Andrew Scott wrote:
> > > Both WML and compact HTML have been submitted to the W3C as notes.
Also,
> > > HDML (basically the predecessor to WML) has also been submitted to
the
> > > W3C in the same way. You ought to be able to find these with a
search.
> >
> > Please see http://www.w3.org/TR.
>
> Or more conveniently, please look at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/Mobile/#submissions
>
> Note that unlike WBXML, WML hasn't been submitted to the W3C.
>
> > > There is a formal liaison process between the WAP Forum and the W3C
for
> > > converging the standards. I don't think anything similar exists
between
> > > NTT and the W3C.
> >
> > No. But NTT is a member of W3C.
>
> More precisely, NTT DoCoMo is also a member of the W3C. We don't need
> a formal "liaison" process with members.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
> W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Monday, 6 March 2000 13:47:05 UTC