Re: please read before our meeting...

Let me first make a few smaller suggestions, for the record:

5.1 Grammar:

   I think I'd prefer "spaces" to "S" in the grammar, as easier to read

5.2; Item Core; last para:

   "who can not see the a fraction...", omit the "a"

5.2; last para, 2nd to last sentence:

   seems to have lost some text, as Deyan observed

5.3 Intent Properties:

   I'd prefer to have the ":" explicit in the description lists

5.3 Intent Properties;

   I'm kinda surprised to see power, index, evaluate as properties. Is 
this simply because there's no token available for a concise 
intent="power", and to avoid the more verbose intent="power($a,$b)"?

If so, it seems an awkward precedent, unless we want to consider *any* 
concept to be a potential property. Scary?


more to come;

bruce


On 10/23/24 00:08, Neil Soiffer wrote:
> 5.2 Intent Concept Dictionaries 
> <https://w3c.github.io/mathml/#mixing_intent_dictionaries> 
> in the MathML spec had a PR that had lingered for a year. Bruce, 
> David, Deyan, and I had extensive discussions over the last few days 
> about how it should be rewritten so that AT developers know what they 
> should and what they are free to do. I have committed something that 
> we can discuss at our Thursday meeting. The section is about 1.5 pages 
> long, so it won't take too long to read, but is long enough that it is 
> a waste of time to read at the meeting.
>
> Please read it before the meeting and take note of what may be 
> confusing or what may be missing or wrong or differs from your 
> expectations.
>
> I'm looking forward to hearing what people think.
>
>     Neil
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2024 18:42:42 UTC