Re: Status of old Notes mathml-types and mathml-bvar

I tend to agree, but I'm not a Content MathML user. Anyone who uses Content
MathML care to chime in?

    Neil


On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 5:07 PM Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote:

> I got a question about the status of two old Notes (from 2003) by the
> Math WG: ‘Structured Types in MathML 2.0’[1] and ‘Bound Variables in
> MathML’[2]. Are they still relevant? Or should they rather be marked as
> obsolete?
>
> It seems to me that ‘Bound Variables in MathML’ is obsolete. MathML3
> (and 4) have other means to express bound variables.
>
> ‘Structured Types in MathML 2.0’ also seems to use outdated MathML2
> constructs, but parts may still be useful.
>
> Any advice?
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/mathml-types/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/mathml-bvar/
>
>
>
> Bert
> --
>    Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
>    http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
>    bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
>    +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
>
>