- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:48:50 -0700
- To: Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkDz5wo0SFqrBztz8RngbKHDOF9xHCfAiqzQGpKuWKTeCg@mail.gmail.com>
It looks like our stack exchange postings overlapped (I guess there is now reinforcement of the "solution"). I'm glad that this was the solution to your problem. Hopefully in a few years, all platforms ship with a math font. Neil On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:42 PM Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com> wrote: > On 4/24/23 10:31 AM, Dave Barton wrote: > > > 3. Is it MathML Core policy that any web pages using it should > > download a math web font? Or is this a temporary problem? Is there a > > good web page explaining this (and recommending a solution) that I > > (jqMath) can link to? I suppose I could change jqMath to automatically > > download a math web font, but authors should be able to override the > > choice, and need to understand this issue, I think. My confusion, and > > the stack overflow issue and chromium bug report(!) which preceded it > > show that the web font requirement is a surprise, even to those of us > > that should know better. > > > > Many thanks for your explanation. I do think this needs clarification > > to us unwashed masses, though. > > > All right, I found > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/MathML/Authoring#mathematical_fonts > and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/MathML/Fonts. Also the > chromium bug has been clarified to be a related special case. So I'm now > back on the MathML bandwagon. :) Sorry to spam the list. - Dave B. > > P.S. Thanks for all your efforts, especially Fred, David Carlisle, and > Neil. MathML definitely looks to be much better now than ever before. > >
Received on Monday, 24 April 2023 21:49:06 UTC