- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:48:50 -0700
- To: Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkDz5wo0SFqrBztz8RngbKHDOF9xHCfAiqzQGpKuWKTeCg@mail.gmail.com>
It looks like our stack exchange postings overlapped (I guess there is now
reinforcement of the "solution").
I'm glad that this was the solution to your problem. Hopefully in a few
years, all platforms ship with a math font.
Neil
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:42 PM Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com> wrote:
> On 4/24/23 10:31 AM, Dave Barton wrote:
>
> > 3. Is it MathML Core policy that any web pages using it should
> > download a math web font? Or is this a temporary problem? Is there a
> > good web page explaining this (and recommending a solution) that I
> > (jqMath) can link to? I suppose I could change jqMath to automatically
> > download a math web font, but authors should be able to override the
> > choice, and need to understand this issue, I think. My confusion, and
> > the stack overflow issue and chromium bug report(!) which preceded it
> > show that the web font requirement is a surprise, even to those of us
> > that should know better.
> >
> > Many thanks for your explanation. I do think this needs clarification
> > to us unwashed masses, though.
> >
> All right, I found
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/MathML/Authoring#mathematical_fonts
> and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/MathML/Fonts. Also the
> chromium bug has been clarified to be a related special case. So I'm now
> back on the MathML bandwagon. :) Sorry to spam the list. - Dave B.
>
> P.S. Thanks for all your efforts, especially Fred, David Carlisle, and
> Neil. MathML definitely looks to be much better now than ever before.
>
>
Received on Monday, 24 April 2023 21:49:06 UTC