- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 20:08:02 -0700
- To: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkCiU7Ke+GSXtKRsP2YOU8nS1HdFjR-=sHkN=M68kJJatA@mail.gmail.com>
We meet at our standard time on Thursday, 10am Pacific, 1pm Eastern,7pm Central European Time. The meeting details were sent to the W3C members-only "member-math" mailing list <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-math/2021May/0000.html> for the group. The regulars for this group should have the meeting details in their calendars. Agenda 1. Announcements/Updates/Progress reports 2. Paul's spoken text survey questions <https://w3c.github.io/mathml-docs/spoken-math-survey> 3. Continue discussion on 'intent' name list/registry/spreadsheet/... Last week, we had some interesting discussions of what should be in the intent table beside the name of the intent. Let's continue that discussion if people have more ideas on it. I had hoped to write up some of my ideas, but didn't manage to get to that. Maybe someone else did? Although I've been trying to avoid discussing the details about intent during the table format/content discussion, there does seem to be a lack of clarity of how to mark up 'intent', so maybe we should go over a few examples and see if there is in fact agreement, or if there is disagreement as to the recommended approach. Like MathML (and many things in life), there are many ways to markup 'intent' but I think most of us agree the WG should have consistent examples and maybe even strong recommendations. The reason for discussing this now is that it may inform us as to the need for one or more columns in the table.
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2022 03:08:26 UTC