- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:27:32 -0700
- To: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkCQk3+Z_enyN4u7eT6Omy_y3e2VjawwMR=XMFCMYNQnuA@mail.gmail.com>
Attendees: - Christopher Comninel - Sam Dooley - Brian Kardell - David Farmer - Deyan Ginev - Patrick Ion - Charles LaPierre - Paul Libbrecht - Louis Maher - Murray Sargent - Neil Soiffer - Stephen Watt - Daniel O'Mahony - Moritz Schubotz - Cary Supalo Regrets: - Laurence Zaysser - David Carlisle Announcements/updates NS: We had a short core meeting on Monday August 30, 2021. In that meeting, BK discussed the "Open Collective" as a means of requesting funds to support MathML implementation. He worked with MUS and NS to raise money. Agalia currently funds most of the work. NS: encourages people who work for companies to ask for funding. NS: Link https://opencollective.com/mathml-core-support NS: is trying to get a response for a meeting with ARIA during the TPAC conference. Gap Analysis Doc NS and DG took a geometry problem from [MathCounts] as a demonstration. They wrote up the problem as it would be read verbally both without and with semantics. That problem was used as an example for further topics in the document. NS: wants to work on Parallel Markup. SD: MUS and MOS have worked on it. SD: talked about the scope of the "parallel" topic discussion. MOS: what are the elements of the content markup. NS: wants the document authors to agree on the syntax of the example being used to demonstrate the various topics in the document. The document used a demonstration element, called point, in the intent description. Point is not a standard MathML element. DG: said that the document pointed out that there were many ways to deal with CD's (Content Dictionaries). SD: We have different places to look for names of operators. PL: If we use "point" we will have to describe what kind of object "point" is. We should not put "point" in the charter. NS: We should not talk about the lack of proper names in MathML in this document. The ways that can be resolved is not germane for the gap analysis. *Action:* SD, MOS, and DG will clean up the parallel section by removing all the comments. NS: There are discussions which have been moved to the bottom. These discussions need work. NS: does not want the gap document to be more than 15 pages long. *Action:* PL: wants to expand the paragraph on "Conversion, Computation and Transfer". *Action:* NS andDG will work on the ARIA label discussion. MOS and DG talked about the "Structured data via schema.org" section. NS: would like to move this section lower in the document. MOS: can this be used for search and accessibility? This would be future technology. *Action* CL: working on Schema.org. Might describe old MathML versus current MathML. NS: asked if anyone else wants to take responsibility for any other parts of the document. NS: hopes to start real editing by next meeting. Move it to a place where math can be shown. The gap document editors have not yet volunteered. NS will be one of them. PL: The brainstorming part of writing this document is almost done.
Received on Friday, 3 September 2021 19:27:56 UTC