- From: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:31:59 +0200
- To: www-math@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 12:32:35 UTC
Le 01/08/2016 à 18:45, David Carlisle a écrit : > I don't think allowing stretchy=stretchy as an alternative to > stretch=true would break anything on the XML side of things, and would > potentially, as you say, allow just stretchy in text/html using its > version of the old SGML shorttag feature. You could say more than me > whether that would simplify or complicate things at implementation level. One additional complexity is that MathML boolean attributes really have three values: "false" or "true" when they are explicit and "automatic" (computed from the operator dictionary etc) when they are not specified. So I'm not sure the HTML5 syntax will work.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 12:32:35 UTC