# Re: Remaining errors in unicode.xml (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/)

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:41:58 +0000
Message-ID: <55057E16.2000306@nag.co.uk>
To: <www-math@w3.org>
On 15/03/2015 10:30, David Carlisle wrote:
> Thanks, fixed those in latest checkin. The ? was I suspect showing some
> doubt about that character and I note that U+2A5E was added at Unicode
> 3.2 which looks very similar and unicode-math assigns \doublebarwedge
> giving the new name \vardoublebarwedge to U+2306.
>
> I've just removed the ? for now, but I wonder if the AMS entry should
> align with unicode-math. I'll check with Barbara how she aligns the AMS
> name to STIX.

Confirmed with Barbara Beeton, the STIX mapping of AMS names does use
2A5E here so I moved the <AMS> entry to that. (No change in the
mathml/html entity definitions)

David
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2015 12:42:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 15 March 2015 12:42:30 UTC