- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:30:39 +0000
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
On 14/03/2015 14:29, Frédéric WANG wrote: > Hi all, > > I don't know if there has been progress regarding the fixes to > unicode.xml, but I still see two obvious errors in the AMS set: > > For U+21CE: <AMS>\nleftrightarrow</AMS> (should be an uppercase L as > for other sets and similarly to U+21CD ; note that this is different > from U+21AE) For U+2306: <AMS>\doublebarwedge ?</AMS> (question mark > should be removed) > > Thanks, > Thanks, fixed those in latest checkin. The ? was I suspect showing some doubt about that character and I note that U+2A5E was added at Unicode 3.2 which looks very similar and unicode-math assigns \doublebarwedge giving the new name \vardoublebarwedge to U+2306. I've just removed the ? for now, but I wonder if the AMS entry should align with unicode-math. I'll check with Barbara how she aligns the AMS name to STIX. David
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2015 10:31:25 UTC