- From: Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:16:28 +0000
- To: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABqxo80nDBxMdPvpkuN5pog+4Jxz3wJFrDkzts2W+RdVFpUVtg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi www-math, Thanks for cross-posting here, Bill! It was on our to-do list but fell through the cracks. > However, as I understand it, their html/css and svg renderings will continue to be derived from MathML That's correct though improving MathJax's internal format (which is essentially MathML) is on the table. > and the (MathJax versions of) Tex and ascii-math inputs will continue to be available as author-friendly inputs for math. That's correct. Best regards, Peter. On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44 PM William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu> wrote: > Dear Friends -- > > Several days ago the MathJax team announced plans for > version 3 of MathJax. It appears that the MathJax team no > longer wants their development path to be focused on > promoting native browser rendering of MathML. > > However, as I understand it, their html/css and svg > renderings will continue to be derived from MathML and the > (MathJax versions of) Tex and ascii-math inputs will > continue to be available as author-friendly inputs for math. > > I'm surprised that they seem not to have announced it here. > Someone else shared the announcement in "texhax", and I > think it to be of even more relevance here. The team's > thoughts about diagrams are certainly relevant here. > > https://www.mathjax.org/whitepaper-towards-mathjax-v3/ > > -- Bill > > > >
Received on Monday, 21 December 2015 09:17:06 UTC