- From: Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:38:33 +0200
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABqxo82GK5eUt+3zd-tLE4hqpHOQP_DpRsPs=KkLK4u0wqLUtA@mail.gmail.com>
Fair enough :-) Peter. Am 18.09.2014 23:33 schrieb "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>: > On 18/09/2014 22:09, Peter Krautzberger wrote: > >> Thanks, David, for confirming the reading of the spec. >> >> So to guarantee \displaystyle we're supposed to do something like >> >> <mstyle scriptlevel="0"> >> <mtable displaystyle="true"> >> ... >> </mtable> >> </mstyle> >> To guarantee \textstyle something like >> >> <mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"> >> <mtable> >> ... >> </mtable> >> </mstyle> >> > > well if an author is coding directly in mathml probably wouldn't have the > mstyle. > If you're converting from TeX code (that is not using \mathchoice) then > you would need that for absolute fidelity, although to be honest often > if tex alignments end up being used in a subscript the author _doesn't > want the table to stay using large fonts, and ammends the code to use > mathchoice so it gets smaller. > > > > >> And >> >> <mfrac> >> <mtable displaystyle="true"> >> ... >> </mtable> >> <mrow> >> ... >> </mrow> >> </mfrac> >> >> would get us a table with displaystyle formatting, but in scriptstyle >> size (when used in an inline formula). (I admit I find that somewhat >> strange; oh well.) >> > > again, if tex did this you probably wouldn't find it strange:-) > >> >> Thanks again for your quick response! >> Peter. >> > > > From the speed you may note that it was a personal response, but I think I > only cited what the spec is saying:-) > > David > >
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 21:39:02 UTC