From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 01:26:32 +0000

Message-ID: <54A350C8.3040103@nag.co.uk>

To: <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 01:26:32 +0000

Message-ID: <54A350C8.3040103@nag.co.uk>

To: <www-math@w3.org>

On 31/12/2014 00:59, saf sied wrote: > I am using a stylesheet from Dr. Carlisle mentioned here: > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/85639/i-want-to-convert-mathml-to-latex > > When I use the Saxon-HE 9.6, both the Java and .NET version of the Saxon > give me the following output for the xml file shown below. The output > does not look right - is it because of the version of Saxon I am using? > Has anyone used Saxon-HE on the stylesheet mentioned above and got the > correct LaTeX? Is there anything else I may be missing? I've latest > versions of Java and .NET installed on my windows 8.1 machine. > > *Output*: > \[\let\par\empty > > {\msup{a}{{2}}} > > \] > > *Source*: > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> > <msup> > <mi>a</mi> > <mn>2</mn> > </msup> > </math> > That's the intended output as far as I recall. there is a latex package pmml-new.sty included in the pmml2tex distribution that defines the latex commands such as \msup used in the output. DavidReceived on Wednesday, 31 December 2014 01:26:58 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:48 UTC
*