- From: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:43:06 +0200
- To: www-math@w3.org
Thanks David, Yes the mathvariant values are there. What I meant is that the arabic unicode code blocks is not mentioned, so it's not clear how to implement these values. Especially the paragraph "Certain combinations of character data and mathvariant values are equivalent to assigned Unicode code points that encode mathematical alphanumeric symbols. These Unicode code points are the ones in the SMP Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbol range U+1D400 to U+1D7FF, listed in the Unicode standard, and the ones in the Letterlike Symbols range U+2100 to U+214F that represent "holes" in the alphabets in the SMP, listed in Section 7.5 Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols." should mention the arabic block, I think. Should probably be done at other places too. Le 28/09/2013 19:34, David Carlisle a écrit : > On 28/09/2013 14:49, Frédéric WANG wrote: >> Hi, >> >> To follow up on the recent discussion on mathvariant ; I think the >> MathML spec should be updated to mention the Arabic Mathematical >> Alphabetic Symbols block introduced in Unicode 6.1: >> >> http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/chapter3.html >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_Mathematical_Alphabetic_Symbols >> >> Frédéric Wang >> > > These are in the MathML3 spec already. > > http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/chapter3.html#presm.commatt > > although not a lot of detail is given, it does say: > >> mathvariant values "initial", "tailed", "looped", and "stretched" are >> appropriate only for Arabic characters. > > > Most of the detailed math alphabet descriptions were moved out of the > MathML spec at MathML 3 and moved to the entities spec. > > The editors draft of that does list the Arabic alphabet block. > > http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/1EE.html > > We should probably submit the editors draft of that as a 2nd edition > REC at some point. > > David > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2013 17:43:22 UTC