- From: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:42:35 +0200
- To: "Davide P. Cervone" <dpvc@union.edu>
- CC: Neil Soiffer <NeilS@DesSci.com>, www-math@w3.org
Yes, that's similar to the horizontal case that I initially mentioned (and for which there is a bug in Firefox since the embellished op rules are completely implemented). I think Neil means that the vertical case does no really come up in practice. In your example, that would be replacing the mover by something like <mrow><mo>(Vertical Arrow)</mo><mspace height="100px"/></mrow>... On 29/03/2012 13:10, Davide P. Cervone wrote: > Actually, I think it does come up in practice: in mtables that are > used to produce commutative diagrams. With cells that contain > horizontal arrows with labels above using mover, should they stretch > to match the label, or the maximum width of the column, or both? If > an arrow has a very wide label, as an embellished operator, is its > natural width the width of the unstretched arrow, or the wide label? > > Davide > > > On Mar 29, 2012, at 1:57 AM, Neil Soiffer wrote: > >> Sorry for not following up. I was at a conference during the last >> working group meeting and this didn't get discussed. I'll bring it >> up and see if we can get some official position on it at our meeting >> next week. >> >> Based on what you and Dave said, I lean towards option 2. Actually, >> I rather remove the rule (which I think Dave wants too), but that's >> not an errata and would need to be done in a spec revision. In any >> case, I doubt this comes up in real life and I suspect it is near the >> bottom of the heap in importance in bug reports for Firefox, >> MathPlayer, etc. Still, it's a hole in the spec and needs to be >> filled... >> >> Neil
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 11:41:45 UTC