- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:09:20 +0000
- To: Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk>
- CC: www-math@w3.org
On 15/03/2012 15:55, Peter Murray-Rust wrote: > the csymbol mechanism is fine for us - the verbosity isn't critical. We > use dictionaries extensively (similar to your cd, but namespaced - does > cd allow a value like cd="cml:foo"? ) > no but there is a cdgroup attribute so one way if you have various namespaces like http:example.com/something/cxml/conceptA http:example.com/something/cxml/conceptB etc is instead of assigning prefixes to these like you would in xml namespace use, use <math cdgroup="http:example.com/something/cxml/"> ...<csymbol cd="conceptA">something</csymbol> ...<csymbol cd="conceptB">otherthing</csymbol> see http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter4.html#contm.csymbol for details.. David
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 16:09:53 UTC