Re: hdotsfor?

On 04/10/2010 00:46, Neil Soiffer wrote:
> I understand that you want lots of dots.  U+2026 may not be the ideal
> character to say that a stretchy version has as many dots as needed to
> fill the area; perhaps there is a better Unicode character.  I think the
> idea of using a stretchy char though is one that fits with the MathML
> spec as it stands now.
>


yes, for examples arrows are stretchy and basically I think you want 
something like

2B38 LEFTWARDS ARROW WITH DOTTED STEM

but without the arrow. I think the nearest you have is to use one of the 
leader dots (or centered dot) and specify it stretchy
David

Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 00:01:31 UTC