- From: Robert Miner <robertm@dessci.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:50:11 -0700
- To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "Urs Holzer" <urs@andonyar.com>
- Cc: "Christoph LANGE" <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>, <www-math@w3.org>
Just because I have it handy, the reference for this is http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html#namespaces --Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: www-math-request@w3.org [mailto:www-math-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of David Carlisle > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:33 PM > To: Urs Holzer > Cc: Christoph LANGE; www-math@w3.org > Subject: Re: How to use CDBase URIs in Content MathML? > > On 12/07/2010 21:23, Urs Holzer wrote: > > I don't think they really do. After all, they provide an XML encoding > > for HTML 5. > > yes but there is no support for extension via namespaces (or anything > else) the only suppported namespaces are xhtml, mathml and svg which > are > explictly mentioned in the html5 (draft) spec, and there is no > provision > of including xml vocabularies in other namespaces, the only mechanism > supported is to persuade the html5 editor to extend html with the > addtitional namespaces. Which isn't the kind of decentralised extension > originally envisaged by the xml namespace spec. I'm not arguing that > that is necessarily good, just observing that is how it is. > > David >
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 22:50:41 UTC