- From: Neil Soiffer <NeilS@dessci.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:49:16 -0700
- To: Ionel Alexandru <ionel.alexandru@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 17:49:53 UTC
Since no one else have waded in, I'll express my opinion as to why... For the use cases of tables in math, each cell is laid out horizontal, line wrapping contents if needed because of a width restriction. The cells, and ultimately the table, will then have a height that is computed based on the width of each cell. Restricting a table to a page or column width is common in laying out tables. A height restriction would imply that widths are not constrained so that the height restriction can be met. Of the to of my head, I think it would be difficult to implement since multiple widths would need to be tried. I am unaware of a use case for restricting or setting an explicit height. Do you have a use case in mind? Neil Soiffer Senior Scientist Design Science, Inc. www.dessci.com ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, Equation Editor ~ On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ionel Alexandru <ionel.alexandru@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > mtable have an atribute *width* but I didn't find the attribute *height*. > Why? > > ionel alexandru > www.fmath.info >
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 17:49:53 UTC