- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:12:52 GMT
- To: ch.lange@jacobs-university.de
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
> So you argue in favour of a revision of the <semantics> spec? not a change in specification, just perhaps another example that has content mathml as first child, but examples don't have to be in the specification document, which should really have the minimum examples needed to describe an element. Once you get too many examples it becomes more tutorial than specification. > This example is convincing, but having each of the <mo>+</mo> link to the > <plus/> is not possible in MathML 2 or 3, is it? yes, why not, stick an id="zzz" on the plus and you can have any number of <mo xref="zzz">+</mo> pointing at that element. > So by "first branch" you mean the branch that comes before the <annotation> > and <annotation-xml> children? yes. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 25 January 2009 00:13:39 UTC