MathML 3.0 far enough along for implementation?


I have a client that is in the midst of implementing a new content 
model. They are currently including MathML 2.0, but I wonder if the 
MathML 3.0 spec is far enough along and backward-compatible enough to 
recommend implementing against this spec? The immediate advantage, is 
that both schemas would be encoded in RelaxNG.

Thanks and best regards,

-- Scott
Scott Hudson
Senior XML Architect

O: 303.542.2146
C: 303.332.1883
F: 303.544.0522
Vision. Experience. Engineering Excellence.

Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 08:27:50 UTC