- From: Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:45:39 -0700
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
Folks, I have a client that is in the midst of implementing a new content model. They are currently including MathML 2.0, but I wonder if the MathML 3.0 spec is far enough along and backward-compatible enough to recommend implementing against this spec? The immediate advantage, is that both schemas would be encoded in RelaxNG. Thanks and best regards, -- Scott Scott Hudson Senior XML Architect e: scott.hudson@FlatironsSolutions.com O: 303.542.2146 C: 303.332.1883 F: 303.544.0522 http://www.FlatironsSolutions.com Vision. Experience. Engineering Excellence.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 08:27:50 UTC